TailsWin
Well-known member
That's what I'm talking about
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


Yep, it's good to have a catch all thread for this. I find it interesting the different AI models have different personalities. It's almost as if the companies were building the databases from different sets of data to enforce certain types of thinking. Nah, that couldn't be happening!Not to hijack Nyghtfall's thread again, regarding how models talk to/about each other.
A while ago I saw a thread on Reddit where people asked various models to visualise other popular models as characters, those results were quite hilarious. Models are quite aware about how people think about them.
(Not my images)
View attachment 9598View attachment 9599
I just watched that video yesterday, to funny you posted itThis dovetails nicely with making DRAM and NVMe drives so expensive people are priced out of desktops and laptops and have to go with cloud connected devices. Not that I'm conspiracy theory minded or anything...
Not to hijack Nyghtfall's thread again, regarding how models talk to/about each other.
A while ago I saw a thread on Reddit where people asked various models to visualise other popular models as characters, those results were quite hilarious. Models are quite aware about how people think about them.
(Not my images)
View attachment 9598View attachment 9599
This is more about post-training tuning. All the big models have access to pretty much all the human data that is available anywhere, but it's the humans that then go in and shape how the model should behave. Smaller changes can be just from a system prompt. It's funny to watch how much can a model's personality change just based on a few instructions. You can have the same model talk like a paranoid caveman, a schoolboy or a dominatrix, and have totally different priorities based on that. And even those are based just on human literature.Yep, it's good to have a catch all thread for this. I find it interesting the different AI models have different personalities. It's almost as if the companies were building the databases from different sets of data to enforce certain types of thinking. Nah, that couldn't be happening!![]()
Agreed. Just look at the google Gemini issue from a year ago where it was programmed to give certain results based off Googles WOKE agenda and not user input.This is more about post-training tuning. All the big models have access to pretty much all the human data that is available anywhere, but it's the humans that then go in and shape how the model should behave. Smaller changes can be just from a system prompt. It's funny to watch how much can a model's personality change just based on a few instructions. You can have the same model talk like a paranoid caveman, a schoolboy or a dominatrix, and have totally different priorities based on that. And even those are based just on human literature.
This is the actual issue with AI running things. It has to be programmed/trained by someone. If AI denies you insurance coverage, it's just following its instructions. The current generation of AIs is strictly deterministic at its core, with some randomness tacked on, but essentially it's an algorithm. You feed it inputs and instructions, it gives you outputs. It's the humans that make the underlying decisions about goals.
When people say AI is effective, what they actually mean, is it's accurate with what they want to do. But if it's something unpleasant, it gives them enough deniability and distance. That's the issue. We could use AI to help create an utopian world, the question is, if it's in the interest of the people running the show.