Higgsfield Replacement for Nano Banana Pro Prompts

[Nyghtfall3D]

This is for anyone who uses NB Pro on Higgsfield. I don't - I use Krea.ai - so I can't vouch for the product, but YT comments and product reviews sound promising.

It's an offline prompt builder for NB Pro written by a programmer named PromptGeek. He posted the first video three days ago, and is currently selling copies via Gumroad for $14.99. An API key for Google Gemini is required.

I Built the AI Cinematography Tool I Wish Existed

Purchase on Gumroad: $14.99

User Guide

 

[MCDesigns]

you know those people that blissfully use DS unaware of dforce and how any of it works? This is me with AI and advanced options, LOL

The guy in the video talks about the lack of options being the creativity killer, sorry, but for for me, it's all about the cost. There is a reason I rarely use NB, Veo or any other high end generator, it's because I know the results will be good and it costs too much. Also I need NSFW content, and only a handful of products at Higgsfield allow for that and NB isn't one.

It's an impressive tool though. maybe one day I will be able to take advantage of it

 

[Nyghtfall3D]

you know those people that blissfully use DS unaware of dforce and how any of it works? This is me with AI and advanced options, LOL

LOL Right on...

There is a reason I rarely use NB, Veo or any other high end generator, it's because I know the results will be good and it costs too much.

I hear that...

The moment I tried NB with ChatGPT prompts and saw what I was missing out on in terms of visual quality, my first thought was, "Well, fuck."

Then, I tried inpainting bare breasts on a test image, saw the stark difference in skin texture and thought, "And there goes nudity... damnit... :: heavy sigh :: ..."

Then, I thought back on all the clothes I bought as a 3D artist but never used because they didn't look good in extreme poses and thought, "Welp, at least AI clothes look awesome, and don't need a fucking cloth simulation that might blow up..."

Nevertheless, I really miss being able to do nudity and am hoping to find a workaround.

 

[Otto Von Herunterhängen]

This is the Internet. SOMEBODY is going to find a way to make a workaround so you can produce porn. Trust me.

 

[MCDesigns]

This is the Internet. SOMEBODY is going to find a way to make a workaround so you can produce porn. Trust me.

it's not even about PORN though, in most apps just prompting "breasts" gives an error. Also to create actual porn, you will usually need a specific LoRA to do that.
It's funny, I have been using Zimage at Higgsfield the past few days and liking it and just started to get NSFW errors this morning, but not all all attempts, AND on prompts that have nothing sexual in them. It's very frustrating having to jump thru so many hoops to be creative.

If a legit site opened up with all the options like Higgsfield has and all the apps were uncensored, I would gladly spend some big bucks on a sub (as would many more I assume).

 

[Otto Von Herunterhängen]

it's not even about PORN though, in most apps just prompting "breasts" gives an error. Also to create actual porn, you will usually need a specific LoRA to do that.
It's funny, I have been using Zimage at Higgsfield the past few days and liking it and just started to get NSFW errors this morning, but not all all attempts, AND on prompts that have nothing sexual in them. It's very frustrating having to jump thru so many hoops to be creative.

If a legit site opened up with all the options like Higgsfield has and all the apps were uncensored, I would gladly spend some big bucks on a sub (as would many more I assume).

Among the Prudish bare breasts ARE porn, even if you're feeding a baby with them. I imagine the backlash over Grok has a lot of sites scrambling. All I am saying is the great-grandson of the guy who figured out how to get line printers to print out dirty pictures with nothing more than the characters you find on a typewriter is busy at work breaking the NSFW filters and you will likely be able to find the site of your dreams shortly. You may have to use Tor to get there and pay in bitcoin .

 

[Nyghtfall3D]

it's not even about PORN though, in most apps just prompting "breasts" gives an error.

Yup, even when they're clothed.

Among the Prudish bare breasts ARE porn, even if you're feeding a baby with them.

This could not be more on point. I once saw a documentary about couples trapped in sexless marriages. They featured a young couple in their 20s who were five years into their marriage. The wife strongly believed sex was only for procreating - they had one kid - but they didn't talk about such things before tying the knot because she felt that discussing them outside of marriage was a no-no.

Julianne Moore's character in the 2013 remake of Carrie was a fundamentalist wack job who frequently referred to breasts as 'dirty pillows'. While that's a fictional reference, it wouldn't surprise me to learn there are people in the world who think the same way.

 

[MCDesigns]

While that's a fictional reference, it wouldn't surprise me to learn there are people in the world who think the same way.

Oh, there are! I dated a girl that told me the only way i was getting into her pants was if we were married, she was completely HOT, but I wasn't going to date her for months to years only to find out the sex was bad AFTER we got married. A lot of things came out with my ex wife after we were married. While the sex was great (before and after we got married), her view of the outside when it came to sex and porn was extremely prudish which she neglected to share with me before we got married. I have dated a few others that were on the judgmental and prudish side also.